Skip to content

Criteo vs OpenX

Based on 111 and 52 real audits

View Criteo details | View OpenX details
MetricCriteoOpenXWinner
Performance2928Criteo
Accessibility8485OpenX
Best Practices7677OpenX
SEO9090Tie
Security6465OpenX
TTFB296ms335msCriteo
Composite7071OpenX
Performance
Criteo
29
OpenX
28
Accessibility
Criteo
84
OpenX
85
Security
Criteo
64
OpenX
65
SEO
Criteo
90
OpenX
90
Composite
Criteo
70
OpenX
71

OpenX outperforms Criteo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). Criteo leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose Criteo

Choose Criteo when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OpenX

Choose OpenX when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 111 audited Criteo sites and 52 audited OpenX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Criteo or OpenX?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Criteo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (29 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Criteo or OpenX?
OpenX sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Criteo or OpenX?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor OpenX (85 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Criteo or OpenX?
Criteo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Criteo or OpenX?
Criteo sites show lower Time to First Byte (296 ms vs 335 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Criteo or OpenX for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Criteo scores higher on overall composite score while Criteo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback