| Metric | Criteo | Prebid | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 29 | 33 | Prebid |
| Accessibility | 84 | 87 | Prebid |
| Best Practices | 76 | 81 | Prebid |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 299ms | 266ms | Prebid |
| Composite | 70 | 72 | Prebid |
Prebid outperforms Criteo in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Criteo leads in no categories.
Criteo doesn't clearly lead Prebid in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Prebid when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 110 audited Criteo sites and 321 audited Prebid sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback