Based on 54 and 1890 real audits
| Metric | Cybot | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 41 | Cybot |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | Cybot |
| Best Practices | 92 | 85 | Cybot |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Cybot |
| Security | 66 | 64 | Cybot |
| TTFB | 267ms | 400ms | Cybot |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Cybot |
Cybot outperforms Google Analytics in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Choose Cybot when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Cybot in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 54 audited Cybot sites and 1890 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback