Skip to content

D3 vs Microsoft

Based on 11 and 2421 real audits

View D3 details | View Microsoft details
MetricD3MicrosoftWinner
Performance4339D3
Accessibility8289Microsoft
Best Practices8786D3
SEO9089D3
Security6766D3
TTFB298ms329msD3
Composite7372D3
Performance
D3
43
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
D3
82
Microsoft
89
Security
D3
67
Microsoft
66
SEO
D3
90
Microsoft
89
Composite
D3
73
Microsoft
72

D3 outperforms Microsoft in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in accessibility.

When to choose D3

Choose D3 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 11 audited D3 sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, D3 or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, D3 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (43 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, D3 or Microsoft?
D3 sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, D3 or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, D3 or Microsoft?
D3 sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), D3 or Microsoft?
D3 sites show lower Time to First Byte (298 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose D3 or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. D3 scores higher on overall composite score while D3 may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback