Skip to content

dc.js vs Google PageSpeed

Based on 72 and 1 real audits

Metricdc.jsGoogle PageSpeedWinner
Performance3751Google PageSpeed
Accessibility8893Google PageSpeed
Best Practices8792Google PageSpeed
SEO93100Google PageSpeed
Security6781Google PageSpeed
TTFB400ms578msdc.js
Composite7482Google PageSpeed
Performance
dc.js
37
Google PageSpeed
51
Accessibility
dc.js
88
Google PageSpeed
93
Security
dc.js
67
Google PageSpeed
81
SEO
dc.js
93
Google PageSpeed
100
Composite
dc.js
74
Google PageSpeed
82

Google PageSpeed outperforms dc.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 74). dc.js leads in TTFB.

When to choose dc.js

Choose dc.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google PageSpeed

Choose Google PageSpeed when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 72 audited dc.js sites and 1 audited Google PageSpeed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, dc.js or Google PageSpeed?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google PageSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, dc.js or Google PageSpeed?
Google PageSpeed sites score higher on security analysis (81 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, dc.js or Google PageSpeed?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google PageSpeed (93 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, dc.js or Google PageSpeed?
Google PageSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), dc.js or Google PageSpeed?
dc.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (400 ms vs 578 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose dc.js or Google PageSpeed for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google PageSpeed scores higher on overall composite score while dc.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback