Based on 72 and 1 real audits
| Metric | dc.js | Google PageSpeed | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 51 | Google PageSpeed |
| Accessibility | 88 | 93 | Google PageSpeed |
| Best Practices | 87 | 92 | Google PageSpeed |
| SEO | 93 | 100 | Google PageSpeed |
| Security | 67 | 81 | Google PageSpeed |
| TTFB | 400ms | 578ms | dc.js |
| Composite | 74 | 82 | Google PageSpeed |
Google PageSpeed outperforms dc.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 74). dc.js leads in TTFB.
Choose dc.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google PageSpeed when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 72 audited dc.js sites and 1 audited Google PageSpeed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback