Skip to content

dc.js vs Microsoft

Based on 70 and 2421 real audits

View dc.js details | View Microsoft details
Metricdc.jsMicrosoftWinner
Performance3739Microsoft
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8786dc.js
SEO9389dc.js
Security6666Tie
TTFB390ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7372dc.js
Performance
dc.js
37
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
dc.js
88
Microsoft
89
Security
dc.js
66
Microsoft
66
SEO
dc.js
93
Microsoft
89
Composite
dc.js
73
Microsoft
72

dc.js and Microsoft are closely matched, each leading in different categories. dc.js has a composite score of 73 while Microsoft scores 72.

When to choose dc.js

Choose dc.js when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 70 audited dc.js sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, dc.js or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, dc.js or Microsoft?
dc.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, dc.js or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, dc.js or Microsoft?
dc.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), dc.js or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 390 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose dc.js or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while dc.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback