Skip to content

dc.js vs Next.js

Based on 70 and 597 real audits

View dc.js details | View Next.js details
Metricdc.jsNext.jsWinner
Performance3738Next.js
Accessibility8890Next.js
Best Practices8788Next.js
SEO9394Next.js
Security6667Next.js
TTFB390ms289msNext.js
Composite7374Next.js
Performance
dc.js
37
Next.js
38
Accessibility
dc.js
88
Next.js
90
Security
dc.js
66
Next.js
67
SEO
dc.js
93
Next.js
94
Composite
dc.js
73
Next.js
74

Next.js outperforms dc.js in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). dc.js leads in no categories.

When to choose dc.js

dc.js doesn't clearly lead Next.js in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Next.js

Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 70 audited dc.js sites and 597 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, dc.js or Next.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, dc.js or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, dc.js or Next.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Next.js (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, dc.js or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), dc.js or Next.js?
Next.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (289 ms vs 390 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose dc.js or Next.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Next.js scores higher on overall composite score while dc.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback