Based on 70 and 3 real audits
| Metric | dc.js | Oracle Infinity | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 50 | Oracle Infinity |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | dc.js |
| Best Practices | 87 | 88 | Oracle Infinity |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | dc.js |
| Security | 66 | 63 | dc.js |
| TTFB | 390ms | 527ms | dc.js |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Oracle Infinity |
dc.js outperforms Oracle Infinity in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 74). Oracle Infinity leads in performance, best practices, composite score.
Choose dc.js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Oracle Infinity when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 70 audited dc.js sites and 3 audited Oracle Infinity sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback