Skip to content

decimal.js vs GSAP

Based on 3 and 242 real audits

View decimal.js details | View GSAP details
Metricdecimal.jsGSAPWinner
Performance2335GSAP
Accessibility8189GSAP
Best Practices7987GSAP
SEO8191GSAP
Security6665decimal.js
TTFB406ms358msGSAP
Composite7073GSAP
Performance
decimal.js
23
GSAP
35
Accessibility
decimal.js
81
GSAP
89
Security
decimal.js
66
GSAP
65
SEO
decimal.js
81
GSAP
91
Composite
decimal.js
70
GSAP
73

GSAP outperforms decimal.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). decimal.js leads in security.

When to choose decimal.js

Choose decimal.js when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose GSAP

Choose GSAP when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited decimal.js sites and 242 audited GSAP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, decimal.js or GSAP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, GSAP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 23 on average).
Which has better security, decimal.js or GSAP?
decimal.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, decimal.js or GSAP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor GSAP (89 vs 81). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, decimal.js or GSAP?
GSAP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 81 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), decimal.js or GSAP?
GSAP sites show lower Time to First Byte (358 ms vs 406 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose decimal.js or GSAP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. GSAP scores higher on overall composite score while decimal.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback