Skip to content

decimal.js vs GSAP

Based on 3 and 320 real audits

View decimal.js details | View GSAP details
Metricdecimal.jsGSAPWinner
Performance2337GSAP
Accessibility8189GSAP
Best Practices7988GSAP
SEO8192GSAP
Security6669GSAP
TTFB406ms443msdecimal.js
Composite7075GSAP
Performance
decimal.js
23
GSAP
37
Accessibility
decimal.js
81
GSAP
89
Security
decimal.js
66
GSAP
69
SEO
decimal.js
81
GSAP
92
Composite
decimal.js
70
GSAP
75

GSAP outperforms decimal.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 70). decimal.js leads in TTFB.

When to choose decimal.js

Choose decimal.js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose GSAP

Choose GSAP when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited decimal.js sites and 320 audited GSAP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, decimal.js or GSAP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, GSAP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 23 on average).
Which has better security, decimal.js or GSAP?
GSAP sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, decimal.js or GSAP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor GSAP (89 vs 81). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, decimal.js or GSAP?
GSAP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 81 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), decimal.js or GSAP?
decimal.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (406 ms vs 443 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose decimal.js or GSAP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. GSAP scores higher on overall composite score while decimal.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback