Based on 3 and 40 real audits
| Metric | decimal.js | Handlebars | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 23 | 35 | Handlebars |
| Accessibility | 81 | 86 | Handlebars |
| Best Practices | 79 | 85 | Handlebars |
| SEO | 81 | 91 | Handlebars |
| Security | 66 | 64 | decimal.js |
| TTFB | 406ms | 500ms | decimal.js |
| Composite | 70 | 71 | Handlebars |
Handlebars outperforms decimal.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). decimal.js leads in security, TTFB.
Choose decimal.js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Handlebars when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited decimal.js sites and 40 audited Handlebars sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback