Skip to content

Delighted vs Facebook

Based on 1 and 1417 real audits

View Delighted details | View Facebook details
MetricDelightedFacebookWinner
Performance2538Facebook
Accessibility8089Facebook
Best Practices7784Facebook
SEO9290Delighted
Security6567Facebook
TTFB169ms280msDelighted
Composite7273Facebook
Performance
Delighted
25
Facebook
38
Accessibility
Delighted
80
Facebook
89
Security
Delighted
65
Facebook
67
SEO
Delighted
92
Facebook
90
Composite
Delighted
72
Facebook
73

Facebook outperforms Delighted in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Delighted leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Delighted

Choose Delighted when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Delighted sites and 1417 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Delighted or Facebook?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, Delighted or Facebook?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Delighted or Facebook?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Delighted or Facebook?
Delighted sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Delighted or Facebook?
Delighted sites show lower Time to First Byte (169 ms vs 280 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Delighted or Facebook for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Delighted may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback