| Metric | DHL | Facebook Pixel | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 32 | DHL |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | DHL |
| Best Practices | 79 | 79 | Tie |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | Facebook Pixel |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 236ms | 389ms | DHL |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
DHL outperforms Facebook Pixel in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Facebook Pixel leads in SEO.
Choose DHL when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook Pixel when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited DHL sites and 575 audited Facebook Pixel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback