Based on 46 and 601 real audits
| Metric | Didomi | DoubleClick Floodlight | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 36 | 32 | Didomi |
| Accessibility | 88 | 87 | Didomi |
| Best Practices | 89 | 81 | Didomi |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Didomi |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 219ms | 357ms | Didomi |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Didomi outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in no categories.
Choose Didomi when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
DoubleClick Floodlight doesn't clearly lead Didomi in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 46 audited Didomi sites and 601 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback