Skip to content

Digioh vs Supabase

Based on 18 and 2 real audits

View Digioh details | View Supabase details
MetricDigiohSupabaseWinner
Performance2949Supabase
Accessibility9086Digioh
Best Practices8388Supabase
SEO91100Supabase
Security6562Digioh
TTFB274ms650msDigioh
Composite7276Supabase
Performance
Digioh
29
Supabase
49
Accessibility
Digioh
90
Supabase
86
Security
Digioh
65
Supabase
62
SEO
Digioh
91
Supabase
100
Composite
Digioh
72
Supabase
76

Supabase outperforms Digioh in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). Digioh leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

When to choose Digioh

Choose Digioh when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Supabase

Choose Supabase when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 18 audited Digioh sites and 2 audited Supabase sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Digioh or Supabase?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Supabase sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, Digioh or Supabase?
Digioh sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Digioh or Supabase?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Digioh (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Digioh or Supabase?
Supabase sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Digioh or Supabase?
Digioh sites show lower Time to First Byte (274 ms vs 650 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Digioh or Supabase for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Supabase scores higher on overall composite score while Digioh may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback