Based on 6 and 64 real audits
| Metric | DigitalOcean | Express | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 78 | 38 | DigitalOcean |
| Accessibility | 80 | 86 | Express |
| Best Practices | 91 | 85 | DigitalOcean |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | DigitalOcean |
| Security | 63 | 65 | Express |
| TTFB | 311ms | 238ms | Express |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | DigitalOcean |
DigitalOcean outperforms Express in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Express leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose DigitalOcean when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Express when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited DigitalOcean sites and 64 audited Express sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback