| Metric | Discourse | HTTP/3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 67 | 51 | Discourse |
| Accessibility | 96 | 88 | Discourse |
| Best Practices | 100 | 88 | Discourse |
| SEO | 100 | 90 | Discourse |
| Security | 71 | 69 | Discourse |
| TTFB | 533ms | 298ms | HTTP/3 |
| Composite | 78 | 75 | Discourse |
Discourse outperforms HTTP/3 in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). HTTP/3 leads in TTFB.
Choose Discourse when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose HTTP/3 when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Discourse sites and 1498 audited HTTP/3 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback