Based on 1 and 107 real audits
| Metric | DISH | Google Cloud CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 39 | Google Cloud CDN |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Google Cloud CDN |
| Best Practices | 92 | 87 | DISH |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Google Cloud CDN |
| TTFB | 232ms | 246ms | DISH |
| Composite | 69 | 73 | Google Cloud CDN |
Google Cloud CDN outperforms DISH in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 69). DISH leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose DISH when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Cloud CDN when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited DISH sites and 107 audited Google Cloud CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback