| Metric | DISH | Google Domains | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 37 | 54 | Google Domains |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | Google Domains |
| Best Practices | 92 | 94 | Google Domains |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | DISH |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Google Domains |
| TTFB | 232ms | 182ms | Google Domains |
| Composite | 69 | 75 | Google Domains |
Google Domains outperforms DISH in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 69). DISH leads in SEO.
Choose DISH when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Domains when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited DISH sites and 228 audited Google Domains sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback