Based on 6 and 1019 real audits
| Metric | Divi | Google Font API | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 44 | Google Font API |
| Accessibility | 79 | 87 | Google Font API |
| Best Practices | 91 | 86 | Divi |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | Google Font API |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 700ms | 403ms | Google Font API |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Google Font API |
Google Font API outperforms Divi in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Divi leads in best practices.
Choose Divi when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Font API when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited Divi sites and 1019 audited Google Font API sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback