Based on 7 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Divi | Material Design Lite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 40 | Divi |
| Accessibility | 77 | 61 | Divi |
| Best Practices | 91 | 77 | Divi |
| SEO | 88 | 92 | Material Design Lite |
| Security | 67 | 74 | Material Design Lite |
| TTFB | 626ms | 544ms | Material Design Lite |
| Composite | 74 | 71 | Divi |
Divi outperforms Material Design Lite in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). Material Design Lite leads in SEO, security, TTFB.
Choose Divi when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Material Design Lite when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Divi sites and 1 audited Material Design Lite sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback