Based on 53 and 2160 real audits
| Metric | Django | Google Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 59 | 42 | Django |
| Accessibility | 93 | 87 | Django |
| Best Practices | 92 | 86 | Django |
| SEO | 95 | 91 | Django |
| Security | 69 | 66 | Django |
| TTFB | 326ms | 434ms | Django |
| Composite | 78 | 74 | Django |
Django outperforms Google Analytics in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Google Analytics leads in no categories.
Choose Django when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Google Analytics doesn't clearly lead Django in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 53 audited Django sites and 2160 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback