Based on 48 and 1533 real audits
| Metric | Django | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 57 | 41 | Django |
| Accessibility | 93 | 90 | Django |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | Django |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Django |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Django |
| TTFB | 292ms | 310ms | Django |
| Composite | 77 | 74 | Django |
Django outperforms Priority Hints in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Priority Hints leads in no categories.
Choose Django when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Priority Hints doesn't clearly lead Django in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 48 audited Django sites and 1533 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback