| Metric | Django | Python | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 57 | 50 | Django |
| Accessibility | 93 | 91 | Django |
| Best Practices | 91 | 88 | Django |
| SEO | 94 | 93 | Django |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 292ms | 370ms | Django |
| Composite | 77 | 75 | Django |
Django outperforms Python in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Python leads in no categories.
Choose Django when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Python doesn't clearly lead Django in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 48 audited Django sites and 95 audited Python sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback