Based on 52 and 1486 real audits
| Metric | Django | Tailwind CSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 59 | 49 | Django |
| Accessibility | 93 | 90 | Django |
| Best Practices | 92 | 89 | Django |
| SEO | 95 | 92 | Django |
| Security | 68 | 69 | Tailwind CSS |
| TTFB | 305ms | 390ms | Django |
| Composite | 77 | 76 | Django |
Django outperforms Tailwind CSS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 76). Tailwind CSS leads in security.
Choose Django when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tailwind CSS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 52 audited Django sites and 1486 audited Tailwind CSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback