Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Google PageSpeed

Based on 600 and 1 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Google PageSpeed details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightGoogle PageSpeedWinner
Performance3251Google PageSpeed
Accessibility8793Google PageSpeed
Best Practices8192Google PageSpeed
SEO91100Google PageSpeed
Security6481Google PageSpeed
TTFB357ms578msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7282Google PageSpeed
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Google PageSpeed
51
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Google PageSpeed
93
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Google PageSpeed
81
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Google PageSpeed
100
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Google PageSpeed
82

Google PageSpeed outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google PageSpeed

Choose Google PageSpeed when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 600 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Google PageSpeed sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Google PageSpeed?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google PageSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Google PageSpeed?
Google PageSpeed sites score higher on security analysis (81 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Google PageSpeed?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google PageSpeed (93 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Google PageSpeed?
Google PageSpeed sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Google PageSpeed?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (357 ms vs 578 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Google PageSpeed for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google PageSpeed scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback