Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Gravito

Based on 596 and 1 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Gravito details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightGravitoWinner
Performance3219DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8196Gravito
SEO9192Gravito
Security6465Gravito
TTFB339ms121msGravito
Composite7268DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Gravito
19
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Gravito
87
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Gravito
65
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Gravito
92
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Gravito
68

Gravito outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (68 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in performance, composite score.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Gravito

Choose Gravito when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Gravito sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Gravito?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 19 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Gravito?
Gravito sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Gravito?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Gravito?
Gravito sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Gravito?
Gravito sites show lower Time to First Byte (121 ms vs 339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Gravito for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback