Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Integral Ad Science

Based on 19 and 2 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Integral Ad Science details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightIntegral Ad ScienceWinner
Performance3243Integral Ad Science
Accessibility8687Integral Ad Science
Best Practices8277DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9188DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6667Integral Ad Science
TTFB209ms18msIntegral Ad Science
Composite7272Tie
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Integral Ad Science
43
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
86
Integral Ad Science
87
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
66
Integral Ad Science
67
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Integral Ad Science
88
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Integral Ad Science
72

Integral Ad Science outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in best practices, SEO.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Integral Ad Science?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Integral Ad Science sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (43 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Integral Ad Science?
Integral Ad Science sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Integral Ad Science for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Integral Ad Science scores higher on performance while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback