Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Microsoft Silverlight

Based on 596 and 1 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Microsoft Silverlight details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightMicrosoft SilverlightWinner
Performance3231DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8770DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8173DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO91100Microsoft Silverlight
Security6467Microsoft Silverlight
TTFB339ms510msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7270DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Microsoft Silverlight
31
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Microsoft Silverlight
70
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Microsoft Silverlight
67
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Microsoft Silverlight
100
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Microsoft Silverlight
70

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Microsoft Silverlight in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Microsoft Silverlight leads in SEO, security.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft Silverlight

Choose Microsoft Silverlight when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Microsoft Silverlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Microsoft Silverlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Microsoft Silverlight?
Microsoft Silverlight sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Microsoft Silverlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 70). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Microsoft Silverlight?
Microsoft Silverlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Microsoft Silverlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (339 ms vs 510 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Microsoft Silverlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback