Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs mod_wsgi

Based on 679 and 2 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View mod_wsgi details
MetricDoubleClick Floodlightmod_wsgiWinner
Performance3373mod_wsgi
Accessibility8789mod_wsgi
Best Practices8398mod_wsgi
SEO9291DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6666Tie
TTFB384ms211msmod_wsgi
Composite7375mod_wsgi
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
33
mod_wsgi
73
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
mod_wsgi
89
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
66
mod_wsgi
66
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
92
mod_wsgi
91
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
73
mod_wsgi
75

mod_wsgi outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in SEO.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose mod_wsgi

Choose mod_wsgi when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 679 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 2 audited mod_wsgi sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or mod_wsgi?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, mod_wsgi sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (73 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or mod_wsgi?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or mod_wsgi?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor mod_wsgi (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or mod_wsgi?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or mod_wsgi?
mod_wsgi sites show lower Time to First Byte (211 ms vs 384 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or mod_wsgi for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. mod_wsgi scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback