Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Open Graph

Based on 594 and 3359 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Open Graph details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightOpen GraphWinner
Performance3245Open Graph
Accessibility8789Open Graph
Best Practices8187Open Graph
SEO9192Open Graph
Security6466Open Graph
TTFB340ms358msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7274Open Graph
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Open Graph
89
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Open Graph
66
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Open Graph
92
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 3359 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Open Graph?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (340 ms vs 358 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback