Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Oracle BlueKai

Based on 594 and 3 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Oracle BlueKai details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightOracle BlueKaiWinner
Performance3229DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8788Oracle BlueKai
Best Practices8177DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9187DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6473Oracle BlueKai
TTFB340ms333msOracle BlueKai
Composite7273Oracle BlueKai
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Oracle BlueKai
29
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Oracle BlueKai
88
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Oracle BlueKai
73
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Oracle BlueKai
87
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Oracle BlueKai
73

Oracle BlueKai outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Oracle BlueKai

Choose Oracle BlueKai when your primary concern is security and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 3 audited Oracle BlueKai sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Oracle BlueKai?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Oracle BlueKai?
Oracle BlueKai sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Oracle BlueKai?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Oracle BlueKai (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Oracle BlueKai?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Oracle BlueKai?
Oracle BlueKai sites show lower Time to First Byte (333 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Oracle BlueKai for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback