Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Outbrain

Based on 594 and 38 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Outbrain details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightOutbrainWinner
Performance3232Tie
Accessibility8785DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8180DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9193Outbrain
Security6464Tie
TTFB340ms327msOutbrain
Composite7271DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Outbrain
32
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Outbrain
85
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Outbrain
64
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Outbrain
93
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Outbrain
71

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Outbrain in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Outbrain leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Outbrain

Choose Outbrain when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 38 audited Outbrain sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Outbrain?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Outbrain?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Outbrain?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Outbrain?
Outbrain sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Outbrain?
Outbrain sites show lower Time to First Byte (327 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Outbrain for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback