Based on 594 and 321 real audits
| Metric | DoubleClick Floodlight | Prebid | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 33 | Prebid |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 81 | 81 | Tie |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | DoubleClick Floodlight |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 340ms | 266ms | Prebid |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Prebid outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 2 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in SEO.
Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Prebid when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 321 audited Prebid sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback