Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs PubMatic

Based on 594 and 47 real audits

MetricDoubleClick FloodlightPubMaticWinner
Performance3232Tie
Accessibility8783DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8175DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9191Tie
Security6464Tie
TTFB340ms295msPubMatic
Composite7270DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
PubMatic
32
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
PubMatic
83
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
PubMatic
64
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
PubMatic
91
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
PubMatic
70

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms PubMatic in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). PubMatic leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PubMatic

Choose PubMatic when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 47 audited PubMatic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or PubMatic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or PubMatic?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or PubMatic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or PubMatic?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or PubMatic?
PubMatic sites show lower Time to First Byte (295 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or PubMatic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback