Based on 594 and 111 real audits
| Metric | DoubleClick Floodlight | PWA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 39 | PWA |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | PWA |
| Best Practices | 81 | 83 | PWA |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | PWA |
| Security | 64 | 67 | PWA |
| TTFB | 340ms | 325ms | PWA |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | PWA |
PWA outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in no categories.
DoubleClick Floodlight doesn't clearly lead PWA in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose PWA when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 111 audited PWA sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback