Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Quantcast Measure

Based on 676 and 69 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Quantcast Measure details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightQuantcast MeasureWinner
Performance3335Quantcast Measure
Accessibility8786DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8377DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9291DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6664DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB383ms319msQuantcast Measure
Composite7372DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
33
Quantcast Measure
35
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Quantcast Measure
86
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
66
Quantcast Measure
64
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
92
Quantcast Measure
91
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
73
Quantcast Measure
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Quantcast Measure in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Quantcast Measure leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Quantcast Measure

Choose Quantcast Measure when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 676 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 69 audited Quantcast Measure sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Quantcast Measure?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Quantcast Measure sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Quantcast Measure?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Quantcast Measure?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Quantcast Measure?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Quantcast Measure?
Quantcast Measure sites show lower Time to First Byte (319 ms vs 383 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Quantcast Measure for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Quantcast Measure scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback