Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Raygun

Based on 634 and 1 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Raygun details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightRaygunWinner
Performance3238Raygun
Accessibility8791Raygun
Best Practices82100Raygun
SEO9192Raygun
Security6581Raygun
TTFB379ms1642msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7281Raygun
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Raygun
38
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Raygun
91
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
65
Raygun
81
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Raygun
92
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Raygun
81

Raygun outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Raygun

Choose Raygun when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 634 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Raygun sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Raygun?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Raygun sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Raygun?
Raygun sites score higher on security analysis (81 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Raygun?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Raygun (91 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Raygun?
Raygun sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Raygun?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (379 ms vs 1642 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Raygun for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Raygun scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback