Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Sailthru

Based on 676 and 47 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Sailthru details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightSailthruWinner
Performance3328DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8786DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8380DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9292Tie
Security6664DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB383ms183msSailthru
Composite7372DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
33
Sailthru
28
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Sailthru
86
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
66
Sailthru
64
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
92
Sailthru
92
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
73
Sailthru
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Sailthru in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Sailthru leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Sailthru

Choose Sailthru when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 676 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 47 audited Sailthru sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Sailthru?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Sailthru?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Sailthru?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Sailthru?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Sailthru?
Sailthru sites show lower Time to First Byte (183 ms vs 383 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Sailthru for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback