Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Shareaholic

Based on 594 and 3 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Shareaholic details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightShareaholicWinner
Performance3242Shareaholic
Accessibility8785DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8180DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9187DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6461DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB340ms550msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7272Tie
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Shareaholic
42
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Shareaholic
85
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Shareaholic
61
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Shareaholic
87
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Shareaholic
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Shareaholic in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Shareaholic leads in performance.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Shareaholic

Choose Shareaholic when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 3 audited Shareaholic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Shareaholic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Shareaholic sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Shareaholic?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Shareaholic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Shareaholic?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Shareaholic?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (340 ms vs 550 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Shareaholic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Shareaholic scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback