Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Skimlinks

Based on 594 and 18 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Skimlinks details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightSkimlinksWinner
Performance3226DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8788Skimlinks
Best Practices8174DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9187DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6462DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB340ms153msSkimlinks
Composite7271DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Skimlinks
26
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Skimlinks
88
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Skimlinks
62
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Skimlinks
87
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Skimlinks
71

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Skimlinks in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Skimlinks leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Skimlinks

Choose Skimlinks when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 18 audited Skimlinks sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Skimlinks?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Skimlinks?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Skimlinks?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Skimlinks (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Skimlinks?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 87 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Skimlinks?
Skimlinks sites show lower Time to First Byte (153 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Skimlinks for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback