Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Stay22

Based on 596 and 4 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Stay22 details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightStay22Winner
Performance3234Stay22
Accessibility8780DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8178DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9190DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6460DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB339ms101msStay22
Composite7270DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Stay22
34
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Stay22
80
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Stay22
60
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Stay22
90
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Stay22
70

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Stay22 in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 70). Stay22 leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Stay22

Choose Stay22 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 4 audited Stay22 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Stay22?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Stay22 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (34 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Stay22?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Stay22?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Stay22?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Stay22?
Stay22 sites show lower Time to First Byte (101 ms vs 339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Stay22 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Stay22 scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback