Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Supabase

Based on 594 and 2 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Supabase details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightSupabaseWinner
Performance3249Supabase
Accessibility8786DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8188Supabase
SEO91100Supabase
Security6462DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB340ms650msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7276Supabase
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Supabase
49
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Supabase
86
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Supabase
62
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Supabase
100
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Supabase
76

Supabase outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Supabase

Choose Supabase when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 2 audited Supabase sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Supabase?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Supabase sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Supabase?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Supabase?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Supabase?
Supabase sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Supabase?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (340 ms vs 650 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Supabase for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Supabase scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback