Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Uplynk

Based on 596 and 1 real audits

MetricDoubleClick FloodlightUplynkWinner
Performance3237Uplynk
Accessibility8777DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8173DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO91100Uplynk
Security6467Uplynk
TTFB339ms198msUplynk
Composite7275Uplynk
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Uplynk
37
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Uplynk
77
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Uplynk
67
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Uplynk
100
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Uplynk
75

Uplynk outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in accessibility, best practices.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Uplynk

Choose Uplynk when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Uplynk sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Uplynk?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Uplynk sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Uplynk?
Uplynk sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Uplynk?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 77). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Uplynk?
Uplynk sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Uplynk?
Uplynk sites show lower Time to First Byte (198 ms vs 339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Uplynk for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Uplynk scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback