Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Webgains

Based on 580 and 1 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Webgains details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightWebgainsWinner
Performance3237Webgains
Accessibility8776DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8188Webgains
SEO9192Webgains
Security6459DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB330ms585msDoubleClick Floodlight
Composite7169DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Webgains
37
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Webgains
76
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Webgains
59
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Webgains
92
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
71
Webgains
69

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Webgains in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 69). Webgains leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webgains

Choose Webgains when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 580 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Webgains sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Webgains?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Webgains sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (37 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Webgains?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 59 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Webgains?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 76). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Webgains?
Webgains sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Webgains?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites show lower Time to First Byte (330 ms vs 585 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Webgains for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Webgains scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback