Based on 624 and 1 real audits
| Metric | DoubleClick Floodlight | Zendesk Chat | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 30 | DoubleClick Floodlight |
| Accessibility | 87 | 86 | DoubleClick Floodlight |
| Best Practices | 82 | 100 | Zendesk Chat |
| SEO | 91 | 100 | Zendesk Chat |
| Security | 65 | 79 | Zendesk Chat |
| TTFB | 379ms | 230ms | Zendesk Chat |
| Composite | 72 | 79 | Zendesk Chat |
Zendesk Chat outperforms DoubleClick Floodlight in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 72). DoubleClick Floodlight leads in performance, accessibility.
Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Zendesk Chat when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 624 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Zendesk Chat sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback