Skip to content

DoubleClick Floodlight vs Zeotap

Based on 596 and 1 real audits

View DoubleClick Floodlight details | View Zeotap details
MetricDoubleClick FloodlightZeotapWinner
Performance3226DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8794Zeotap
Best Practices8177DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9192Zeotap
Security6458DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB339ms127msZeotap
Composite7269DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Zeotap
26
Accessibility
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Zeotap
94
Security
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
Zeotap
58
SEO
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Zeotap
92
Composite
DoubleClick Floodlight
72
Zeotap
69

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Zeotap in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). Zeotap leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Zeotap

Choose Zeotap when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 596 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites and 1 audited Zeotap sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleClick Floodlight or Zeotap?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleClick Floodlight or Zeotap?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 58 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleClick Floodlight or Zeotap?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Zeotap (94 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleClick Floodlight or Zeotap?
Zeotap sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleClick Floodlight or Zeotap?
Zeotap sites show lower Time to First Byte (127 ms vs 339 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleClick Floodlight or Zeotap for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleClick Floodlight may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback