Skip to content

DoubleVerify vs HSTS

Based on 12 and 2556 real audits

View DoubleVerify details | View HSTS details
MetricDoubleVerifyHSTSWinner
Performance3449HSTS
Accessibility8689HSTS
Best Practices7888HSTS
SEO8991HSTS
Security6470HSTS
TTFB259ms364msDoubleVerify
Composite7175HSTS
Performance
DoubleVerify
34
HSTS
49
Accessibility
DoubleVerify
86
HSTS
89
Security
DoubleVerify
64
HSTS
70
SEO
DoubleVerify
89
HSTS
91
Composite
DoubleVerify
71
HSTS
75

HSTS outperforms DoubleVerify in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). DoubleVerify leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleVerify

Choose DoubleVerify when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited DoubleVerify sites and 2556 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleVerify or HSTS?
DoubleVerify sites show lower Time to First Byte (259 ms vs 364 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleVerify or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleVerify may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback