Skip to content

DoubleVerify vs HSTS

Based on 12 and 3295 real audits

View DoubleVerify details | View HSTS details
MetricDoubleVerifyHSTSWinner
Performance3452HSTS
Accessibility8690HSTS
Best Practices7889HSTS
SEO8992HSTS
Security6473HSTS
TTFB259ms403msDoubleVerify
Composite7178HSTS
Performance
DoubleVerify
34
HSTS
52
Accessibility
DoubleVerify
86
HSTS
90
Security
DoubleVerify
64
HSTS
73
SEO
DoubleVerify
89
HSTS
92
Composite
DoubleVerify
71
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms DoubleVerify in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 71). DoubleVerify leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleVerify

Choose DoubleVerify when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited DoubleVerify sites and 3295 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleVerify or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleVerify or HSTS?
DoubleVerify sites show lower Time to First Byte (259 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleVerify or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleVerify may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback