Skip to content

DoubleVerify vs Microsoft

Based on 12 and 2421 real audits

View DoubleVerify details | View Microsoft details
MetricDoubleVerifyMicrosoftWinner
Performance3439Microsoft
Accessibility8689Microsoft
Best Practices7886Microsoft
SEO8989Tie
Security6466Microsoft
TTFB259ms329msDoubleVerify
Composite7172Microsoft
Performance
DoubleVerify
34
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
DoubleVerify
86
Microsoft
89
Security
DoubleVerify
64
Microsoft
66
SEO
DoubleVerify
89
Microsoft
89
Composite
DoubleVerify
71
Microsoft
72

Microsoft outperforms DoubleVerify in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). DoubleVerify leads in TTFB.

When to choose DoubleVerify

Choose DoubleVerify when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited DoubleVerify sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, DoubleVerify or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, DoubleVerify or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, DoubleVerify or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, DoubleVerify or Microsoft?
DoubleVerify sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), DoubleVerify or Microsoft?
DoubleVerify sites show lower Time to First Byte (259 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose DoubleVerify or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while DoubleVerify may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback