Based on 12 and 321 real audits
| Metric | DoubleVerify | Prebid | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 33 | DoubleVerify |
| Accessibility | 86 | 87 | Prebid |
| Best Practices | 78 | 81 | Prebid |
| SEO | 89 | 90 | Prebid |
| Security | 64 | 64 | Tie |
| TTFB | 259ms | 266ms | DoubleVerify |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Prebid |
Prebid outperforms DoubleVerify in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). DoubleVerify leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose DoubleVerify when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Prebid when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 12 audited DoubleVerify sites and 321 audited Prebid sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback