Skip to content

Download Monitor vs Fathom

Based on 2 and 17 real audits

View Download Monitor details | View Fathom details
MetricDownload MonitorFathomWinner
Performance5458Fathom
Accessibility8990Fathom
Best Practices10092Download Monitor
SEO10097Download Monitor
Security6962Download Monitor
TTFB189ms317msDownload Monitor
Composite7876Download Monitor
Performance
Download Monitor
54
Fathom
58
Accessibility
Download Monitor
89
Fathom
90
Security
Download Monitor
69
Fathom
62
SEO
Download Monitor
100
Fathom
97
Composite
Download Monitor
78
Fathom
76

Download Monitor outperforms Fathom in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 76). Fathom leads in performance, accessibility.

When to choose Download Monitor

Choose Download Monitor when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Fathom

Choose Fathom when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited Download Monitor sites and 17 audited Fathom sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Download Monitor or Fathom?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Fathom sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 54 on average).
Which has better security, Download Monitor or Fathom?
Download Monitor sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Download Monitor or Fathom?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fathom (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Download Monitor or Fathom?
Download Monitor sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 97 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Download Monitor or Fathom?
Download Monitor sites show lower Time to First Byte (189 ms vs 317 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Download Monitor or Fathom for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Fathom scores higher on overall composite score while Download Monitor may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback